Council cuts back efforts to turn vacant office and commercial buildings into social homes

The council is scaling back its work to turn vacant office and commercial buildings into social homes, via its “adaptive reuse” scheme, said Mick Mulhern, Dublin City Council’s head of housing, on Monday evening.

The council needs to move staff to focus on other housing projects that will deliver more homes, he said at the May monthly meeting of Dublin City Council.

Green Party Councillor Claire Byrne had queried the fate of the programme, mentioning it among a list of housing schemes that she said she felt were stalled or had been rolled back.

She pointed, as other councillors did, to much-tightened funding for the tenant-in-situ scheme, a homeless-prevention measure whereby the council can buy rental homes in cases where eligible tenants are being evicted for a sale. 

But also, “another scheme that seems to have been abandoned is the adaptive reuse scheme”, she said.

“Which is shocking considering the level of vacancy and office space across the city that we have that could be so easily adapted to provide long-term quality homes for our citizens,” she said.

From a low of under 10 percent in 2020, the vacancy rate for Dublin office space has been on the rise for several years, increasing “from 15.7% to 17.5% last year”, according to Savills 2025 Market Outlook report.

Dublin City Council set up its Adaptive Reuse Unit in October 2022. 

“The main objective is to deliver new homes by refurbishing vacant office and commercial space for social housing,” said Fiona Craven, a council official in the team in October 2023. 

And, “to restore derelict properties and to protect newly vacant properties”, she said.

By last December, the unit had 14 projects in progress to provide an estimated 125 social homes, a council report says.  That was already scaled back to six projects and 59 homes, in a report this month.

But it’ll be even fewer.

“We will be progressing one of those schemes, instead of six of them,” said Mulhern. That’s for about 15 homes at Fitzwilliam Quay, he said. 

Said Byrne: “We’re just going backwards on providing housing, and not just any housing, quality housing.”

Mulhern said that the council did see it as a really worthwhile program. 

“It does a great deal for the city, place making and reinvigorating the streetscapes,” he said, “and it can provide housing.”

But they’ve had to reallocate some of that staff to some of the bigger housing projects that will deliver more homes faster, he said.

The council is reviewing its staffing, though, and after that review is done, its housing department should get more staff, he said.

“At that point, when those staff land, we’ll be able to look at the big pipeline of sites that we will have available,” he said.

Mulhern said he thought it was the right move to make a judgment call based on numbers, he said. 

In the meantime, the Fitzwilliam Quay project will help them understand better what adaptive schemes involve, he said. 

Deirdre Heney, the Fianna Fáil councillor and head of the housing committee, said she understands the logic. “Value for money is the way I would look at it.” 

There are schemes, like the “enhanced works programme” for social homes – which seeks to improve the maintenance in older flat complexes and extend the life of those buildings – that make a lot of sense to her, she says. 

On Tuesday, Byrne said she still had questions about the retreat from adaptive reuse. “I hope it’s just a temporary removal of staff, but my concern is that it’s not viewed as a priority project in the city.”

She wants to see more detail of what cost-benefit analysis has been done of adaptive reuse projects, she said, to look more closely at the assertion that this reuse of buildings isn’t worth it right now.

“That’s really concerning,” she said. 

Could it also mean downgrading attention given to other reuse schemes, such as the push to reactivate above-the-shop spaces? said Byrne.

Among the “big moves” recommended in the Dublin City Centre Taskforce Report, headed up by David Redmond, was that the city needed more money and accelerated schemes to tackle vacancy and dereliction.

This would seem to be moving away from that, says Byrne.

A spokesperson for Dublin City Council hasn’t yet responded to queries sent Tuesday asking when the staffing review is expected to be completed.